Morgan Hayduk & Andrew Batey
Morgan Hayduk is the Co-CEO and Co-Founder of Beatdapp, an entertainment technology company. Ranked #2 startup in Canada and Top 20 Music Companies globally by TechCrunch, Beatdapp is building digital supply chain infrastructure for the streaming economy. Prior to Beatdapp, Hayduk led enterprise growth and partnerships for ZipRecruiter (NYSE:ZIP), was the Director of Federal Government Relations for TELUS Communications, and served as a consultant for Canada’s leading boutique government relations firm, Crestview Strategy. As a consultant, Hayduk specialized in entertainment & technology, representing Music Canada (the domestic trade association for Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, and Sony Music) and Hasbro's entertainment studio eOne, along with Facebook, Uber and TELUS. Hayduk was part of the team that led to the passage of Canada’s signature music copyright protection legislation, which extended copyright from 50 to 70 years.
Andrew is the Co-CEO & Co-Founder of Beatdapp. Previously, Andrew helped launch and promote multiple top 10 (iTunes & Billboard chart) musicians, major brands, and successful web properties. Over the last 15 years, Andrew served as an executive at various technology companies across media, healthcare, and D2C brands. Most recently, he served as the Head of Growth at EasyMarkit, a Vancouver-based patient communication SaaS in the medical industry processing over 60 Million messages monthly. Prior to EasyMarkit, Batey was the Chief Marketing Officer at Spinlister, a peer-to-peer action sports sharing economy with inventory and users from over 100 countries. Over the course of his career, he’s raised over $50M for successful technology ventures and mentored dozens of high growth startups in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York City.
Who are you? Where do you work?
Morgan Hayduk (Toronto) and Andrew Batey (Vancouver), co-founders & co-CEOs at Beatdapp.
What are you currently listening to?
Give us a small insight into your daily routine…
As founders, we get to do a bit of everything, daily.
Client meetings, paperwork (no one tells you how much paperwork there will be), team meetings, product ideation, business development, new employee interviews, strategy planning… you name it, we’re probably doing it in any given week.
Over to you, Morgan & Andrew…
What is Streaming Fraud?
Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defines streaming fr… Just kidding. How lame of an opener would that be?!
We talk a lot about streaming fraud around at Beatdapp: in articles, podcasts, blog posts, you name it. To us, it feels like common knowledge. But actually finding a uniform definition isn’t as easy as you’d think. And if we’re going to solve it, we should probably agree on what it means.
To some, it’s “anything which isn’t fans listening to music they love.” To others, it’s akin to how “an athlete might take performance-enhancing drugs only to keep up with their peers.” For some, it’s still, “when an artist uses artificial means to increase their streams.”
None of those, however, feel totally adequate.
That’s because there are two different motivations, both of which need to be satisfied by a definition.
And when we talk about streaming fraud, we usually only cover one: the artist-centric view of the problem. In doing this we:
- Make artists seem responsible for WAY more fraud than they are;
- Trivialize legitimate criminal enterprise by making streaming fraud sound innocent.
We risk mischaracterizing the seriousness of the problem when we talk about it like: “aw-shucks, I accidentally bought some fake streams…” In reality, it’s often more nefarious, deliberate, and far removed from real artists. It’s the intentional uploading of algorithmically generated, nonsense, or copyright-infringing material for the sole purpose of diverting streaming revenues to the perpetrator at the expense of every other legitimate rights holder.
So we propose to define it as follows:
Streaming fraud is when an individual or group leverages bots, stolen accounts, or manipulated platform features to alter the perception of their own commercial success and/or steal streaming income that otherwise belongs to every legitimate artist and music industry professional.
Perception fraud – check. Financial fraud – check. A little less blame being ascribed to artists – check.
No definition is perfect, but we hope that this helps set the table for a more robust conversation about streaming fraud, and how to fight it.
Where should readers go to find out more? Is there any further reading or digital gurus to recommend?
Right here: Beatdapp.com